The NY Times has a good article about how high prices are stifling “broadband” adoption, following AOL’s announcement of its approach to broadband.
Apparently it’s doubtful that any providers can make money at $40 to $55/month in charges to the user:
[AOL] has developed a new approach to these deals that includes the brand of the network provider along with AOL’s. That makes things clearer for consumers and less of a threat to the cable and phone companies.
In the first of those deals, with Comcast, AOL will price the bundled service at $55 a month, $6 less than the combined price of Comcast’s broadband service and AOL’s bring-your-own-access plan.
Still, that is about $10 a month more than other providers are charging. That premium is how AOL actually makes a profit on its broadband service when Earthlink loses money charging $42 to $50 a month.
Clearly the access monopolies (cable and ILEC’s) are raking it it at these rates. Their profits are near 100% because their costs are near zero. AOL and Earthlink can’t sell broadband access because they don’t own any.
One reply on “Broadband prices itself out of the market”
they can all piss off until they cut their prices in half!