Categories
Analysis

Arguments against media consolidation that a Republican could love

Media companies have become collections of random assets — worth less than the sums of their parts, says financial columnist James Flanigan in the Los Angeles Times. He argues that media companies must slim down and focus on a single medium and decide whether they’re in the business of production or distribution.

The average return on invested capital over the last five years of the four major media firms — AOL Time Warner Inc., Walt Disney Co., News Corp. and Viacom Inc. — is less than 4% annually. (Vivendi Universal is excluded because it has no profit.)
That is laughably far below the 13% average return on capital for all large U.S. companies in the same period, as measured by Forbes magazine.

William Safire goes further, saying that even if they decide to focus, media giants should not be permitted to dominate their industries. Safire’s libertarian brand of Republicanism is at odds with the current regime’s pro-corporate, anti-civil liberties Republicanism:

Does this make me (gasp!) pro-regulation? Michael Powell, appointed by Bush to be F.C.C. chairman, likes to say “the market is my religion.” My conservative economic religion is founded on the rock of competition, which — since Teddy Roosevelt’s day — has protected small business and consumers against predatory pricing leading to market monopolization.

Flanigan and Safire help make the case that in addition to being bad for democracy and for consumers (reason enough to break up the media giants), the current trend toward gigantism is bad for stockholders.
Now that Steve Case is an a mere (albeit big) stockholder and no longer a manager at AOL Time Warner, he should insist on breaking up the company.

Categories
Analysis

Asimov's rules of corporations?

While I was in Belize, I found time to read Fast Food Nation and Culture Jam, both of which got me thinking (or kept me thinking) about how out of control corporations have become and how complicit we all are in this situation.
The issue that Culture Jam raises–which is still pretty much limited to the left–is that it’s a big problem that corporations are regarded in US law as having the same rights as human beings. That leads to the perverse idea that they should be allowed to participate (spend money) in the political process, for example.
I’ve always believed that the US corporations should not be allowed to violate our constitutional rights any more than the government can–especially the first and fourth amendments. In any event, it occurred to me that corporations were humanlike, but not quite human, and that something like Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics ought to apply to them.
Today I found this article on Nike’s claim that it has the right to lie, and the author’s suggestion that Asimov might have already thought this problem through. Some ideas are just in the air. (Thanks, WebWord!)
The chapters of Fast Food Nation on worker safety in the meatpacking industry broke my heart. I don’t know why, but I’m still stunned by the cruelty and indifference with which some people are able to treat others. But I am ashamed that as a nation we’re incapable of electing a Congress willing to do something about this.

Categories
News

Where everybody knows your name

The current system of using the name of the corporation that you buy internet access from as your email address doesn’t work. Over 200,000 people in New England have had to change their addresses from [email protected] to [email protected] to [email protected] in the last year. And if an existing Comcast customer already has [email protected], they’re going to have to change their user name as well.
As David Weinberg says, “This is the clearest example I’ve seen of the confluence of the marketing and cattle farmer’s sense of ‘branding.'”
This system makes some sense when you’re talking about the address where you do your employer’s business. But there is no excuse any longer for yoking your digital identity to that of your access provider. Get your own domain. This will also make it easier to change access providers without notifying everyone in your address book.
At least that’ll work until more access companies limit our access to POP and SMTP.

Categories
Research

Broadband will increase access concentration

Broadband use is increasing, and dial-up is declining. This is a dramatic change of course and it has far-reaching implications.
Mid-sized ISP’s will have to become part of a larger enterprise or go out of business. We face the prospectedof AOL and Microsoft increasing their hold on the dial-up market. The market should support a few smaller local boutique ISP’s, but it’s not going to be a very good living for anyone, even living under AOL’s rather tall price umbrella.
If you don’t like AOL and Microsoft dominating the access business, don’t worry–dial-up is dying. But you’re not going to like the alternative. The broadband business is much more concentrated than dial-up. The big players your “local” telco (SBC, Verizon, etc) or your “local” cable company (Comcast or AOL Time Warner Cable (which is a very different company from the AOL division of the same corporation)) whose stupidity, bullying, and political clout make AOL and Microsoft seem positively geeky.

Categories
Analysis

Living off the grid is great…when you have a choice

I’m back from Belize.
Spending a couple of weeks off the grid made me realize how little access I need, but how much I hate having someone deny it to me.
My only Internet access was an Internet cafe that was a 15 minute boat ride from my resort on Ambergris Caye. Phone calls home were a couple of dollars a minute at the front desk of the resort or a dollar a minute at the Internet cafe in town.
In the ten days that I was in Belize, I didn’t miss the Net or NPR or TV at all, and I think the general lack of electronic and automotive background noise contributed to a sense of peace and well-being. The biggest disturbance was a couple of boneheads that kept cruising up and down the beach on motor scooters until one of the neighbors chewed them out.
I doubt I would have appreciated this isolation on September 11, but it probably would have been better for me than watching CNN.
I thoroughly enjoyed dropping off the grid. What I hated was that others were in control of my access. The resorts on the north coast of Ambergris Caye had apparently decided together not to bring in newspapers. Our hotel was using their control of their phone to jack up the price of a call to the US and keep me from using AT&T’s low-price service. And it seemed pretty clear that the price floor was kept pretty high by Belize Telecom Limited, which controls telephone and Net access in Belize.
What worries me is that if ILEC’s had their druthers, and the Republicans are inclined to let them, phone calls in the US would be be a dollar a minute and we’d all be sharing dial-up lines in Internet Cafes.